Clarifying news request
I’m noticing that the user may want to verify news, so I should ask what exactly they need—like an explanation, a rewrite, sources, or a full article. This feels a bit ambiguous, so I think the best approach is to keep it concise. I can provide a brief sports news summary in Chinese and then check if they’d like a longer article or sources, while being careful not to make up any facts.Crafting concise response
I’m trying to clarify the user’s needs, so I think I should ask: "Do you need me to organize more detailed transfer background, contract information, or rewrite it as a news article or tweet?" I don't think I need to use the plan tool for this; it's a pretty straightforward task. Therefore, I’ll put together the final answer in Chinese and keep it concise.
要我把这条做成一则简讯吗？简版如下：
- 塞雷佐表示，马竞边锋“ 小蜘蛛 ”利诺无意离队，俱乐部对其未来充满信心。
- 关于皇马主席人选，弗洛伦蒂诺过去曾公开称纳达尔具备成为皇马主席的潜质，未来不排除其接班的可能。
需要我：
- 扩写成300-500字新闻稿并配上背景数据？
- 做成社媒帖（微博/推特风格，多语言可选）？
- 整理两条消息的来源与时间线以便核验？ 